Eggcorn Forum

Discussions about eggcorns and related topics

You are not logged in.

Announcement

Registrations were closed for a long time because of forum spam, but I have re-opened them on a trial basis.

The forum administrator (chris dot waigl at gmail dot com) reserves the right to request users to plausibly demonstrate that they are real people with an interest in the topic of eggcorns. Otherwise they may be removed with no further justification. Likewise, accounts that have not been used for posting may be removed.

Thanks for your understanding.

Chris -- 2015-05-30

#1 2017-09-23 10:31:42

kem
Eggcornista
From: Victoria, BC
Registered: 2007-08-28
Posts: 2540

some << sum

We haven’t really discussed “some of money” on the Forum. It’s quite a common replacement for “sum of money,” as you can see in this list of Google hits” for “large some of money.” Google ngram suggests that the switch happens in about a tenth of one percent of published sources.


Hatching new language, one eggcorn at a time.

Offline

 

#2 2017-09-25 04:03:01

Peter Forster
Eggcornista
From: UK
Registered: 2006-09-06
Posts: 981

Re: some << sum

More some/summary. It may be that ‘zero-some’ is being used like tiresome or lonesome in sum examples.

Unfortunately, Kenya has taken on a dangerous trajectory in which politics is being played as a zero-some game where winning, whatever the method, is all that matters.

But, the good news is that it’s not a zero-some game.

So we are in a situation where it’s a zero-some game. No matter which side you may be on. Such is the political landscape as we enter into the …

Offline

 

#3 2017-09-25 16:54:02

Dixon Wragg
Eggcornista
From: Cotati, California
Registered: 2008-07-04
Posts: 1190

Re: some << sum

Peter Forster wrote:

It may be that ‘zero-some’ is being used like tiresome or lonesome in sum examples.

Or it may be that the perps are thinking one player will get zero and the other player will get some.

Offline

 

#4 2017-09-25 18:10:24

DavidTuggy
Eggcornista
From: Mexico
Registered: 2007-10-11
Posts: 2082
Website

Re: some << sum

I think you’re right, Dixon. Which of course does not deny that Peter’s analysis may be right for some perps as well/instead.


*If the human mind were simple enough for us to understand,
we would be too simple-minded to understand it* .

(Possible Corollary: it is, and we are .)

Offline

 

Board footer

Powered by PunBB
PunBB is © 2002–2005 Rickard Andersson
Individual posters retain the copyright to their posts.

RSS feeds: active topicsall new posts