Eggcorn Forum

Discussions about eggcorns and related topics

You are not logged in.

Announcement

Registrations are currently closed because of a technical problem. Please send email to if you wish to register.

The forum administrator reserves the right to request users to plausibly demonstrate that they are real people with an interest in the topic of eggcorns. Otherwise they may be removed with no further justification. Likewise, accounts that have not been used for posting may be removed.

Thanks for your understanding.

Chris -- 2018-04-11

#1 2021-07-19 11:56:52

DavidTuggy
Eggcornista
From: Mexico
Registered: 2007-10-11
Posts: 2714
Website

not after < only after

We have had a number of cases where a structure has been used which means the opposite of what was intended. (Kem is probably keeping better track of these than the rest of us are.) The following was in the news today:

A man wading in the waters off the coast of Florida had a close encounter with a hammerhead shark. Fortunately, the large animal apparently lost interest in the man, but not after appearing to charge towards him.

The accompanying video clearly shows the shark charging rapidly towards the man, then veering ( verging? ) away in apparent disinterest.
.
A blend of only after with not before or perhaps with not without , I suppose. ( Not until probably fits in there too, but it collocates better with other kinds of complement; I at least wouldn’t say not until appearing to charge , but not until it had appeared to charge .) How people might say it I sort of understand, but to write it, and then for copy-editors to pass it, is noteworthy.
.
I had documented something similar a couple of times before, and there are quite certainly more out there:

Caroline turned towards the front but not after giving Elizabeth a very nasty glare

Apparently, he was in the military for a brief stint, but he was injured in battle, but not after receiving medals for his bravery in battle.

(That second one has to have meant “not without” rather than “not before/after”. The injury indeed happened before the medals, not after, but it would be pretty odd to emphasize that fact.)
.
This is an independent attestation-and-analysis that basically comes to the same conclusion about what is happening. Is it spreading, becoming more standard for some?

Last edited by DavidTuggy (2021-07-20 09:40:43)


*If the human mind were simple enough for us to understand,
we would be too simple-minded to understand it* .

(Possible Corollary: it is, and we are .)

Offline

 

#2 2021-09-19 13:29:10

kem
Eggcornista
From: Victoria, BC
Registered: 2007-08-28
Posts: 2851

Re: not after < only after

Interesting. I think there may a suppressed “until” in these locutions.


Hatching new language, one eggcorn at a time.

Offline

 

Board footer

Powered by PunBB
PunBB is © 2002–2005 Rickard Andersson
Individual posters retain the copyright to their posts.

RSS feeds: active topicsall new posts