chock » chalk(ed)

Chiefly in:   chalk(ed) full, chalk-filled

Classification: English

Analyzed or reported by:

  • Mark Liberman (link)
  • Paul Brians (link)

The title of Mark Liberman’s 2004 Language Log piece gives a whole pile of variants: “Chock, choke, chuck, check, chalk, jock, shock, chog: An ancient plantation of ache-corns”. “Choke-full” is the original (with “chuck-full” and “chock-full” as early variants); “chock-full” is now the dominant variant. “Chock” doesn’t make much sense, so it’s no surprise that people have attempted to re-shape it. The connection to chalk is obscure (Brians: “Chalk has nothing to do with it”), but at least “chalk” is a reasonably common actual word (and homophonous with “chock” for some speakers).

“Chalk full” has been reported at least five times in the ecdb comments pages.

| link | entered by Arnold Zwicky, 2007/08/16 |

Add your commentary

A (valid) e-mail address is required, but it will never be displayed or communicated to anyone without your consent. Comment moderation may be in place and delay posting of your commentary. Please don't re-submit it.

Separate paragraphs by blank lines. You can use the following HTML tags: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <code> <em> <i> <strike> <strong> .

Please remember that comments on entries should add data or pertinent remarks.

(required)

(required)