Discussions about eggcorns and related topics
You are not logged in.
Registrations were closed for a long time because of forum spam, but I have re-opened them on a trial basis.
The forum administrator (chris dot waigl at gmail dot com) reserves the right to request users to plausibly demonstrate that they are real people with an interest in the topic of eggcorns. Otherwise they may be removed with no further justification. Likewise, accounts that have not been used for posting may be removed.
Thanks for your understanding.
Chris -- 2015-05-30
A co-worker just said to me, “That’s quite a dilemma, and not one I’m going to wage in on.” I’ve found instances of it on the web:
http://www.marketwatch.com/News/Story/S … iteid=mktw
Check back at guruscorner.com on Wednesday when firebrand Martin Weiss of the Safe Money Report will wage in on the rate cut and its effect on deflation.
[probably for “weigh in”]
Religious leaders are often quick to wage in on the negative site for the video game debate but not so in this case.
[possibly for “wade in”]
War was also no longer limited to the combatting sides, for foreigners could wage in on one side or another and change completely the dynamics of the conflict.
[likely directly affected by “waging war”]
http://community.eons.com/groups/topics … /1/2007/05
I’m going to take a risk here and wage in on a delicate topic that seems to pervade many of these postings
[could be weigh or wade]
http://pages.stern.nyu.edu/~nlevina/GOS … -FTMBa.htm
We will wage in on the debate on the pros and cons of global sourcing (offshoring).
[probably for “weigh in”]
16,300 total ghits for “wage in on” but not all are examples of this usage—about 50%, by the look of the first couple of pages of results.
Last edited by sesquiotic (2007-10-25 10:40:11)
Kem, “wage in on” is clearly bizarre in a good way, and “wager the pros and cons” is a credible eggcorn. They’re not related, are they, other than through ovulating the same acorn? I’m not quite sure what “wage in on” is. A simple malaprop for weigh? No, that wouldn’t explain it. A back-formation from wager?1 That would be delightful*, but wager doesn’t fit the sense of “weigh in on”. A reference to payment or salary or earnings – maybe like putting your two bits in? A long shot, but vaguely egg-shaped. There is none of the verb sense of “wage” as in “carry on”, “prosecute with prejudice”.
Ultimately, I’d wager it contains elements of all of the above, and that’s why I like it.
1 Hold on, they’re out there:
* I’m not enthusiastic about all back-formations. One that just came and smacked me upside the head last week was “incenting”, for motivating. Yurg.