Discussions about eggcorns and related topics
You are not logged in.
The Eggcorn Forum and the Eggcorn Database are currently in the process of being converted into static sites.
Once the conversion is complete, all existing posts are expected to still be accessible at their original URLs. However, no new posts will be possible.
Feel free to comment on the relevant forum threads.
Chris -- 2025-05-10
Pages: 1
from front page…
Spotted in the wild:
bq:
‘My’ appears to be substituted not only for “might” but perhaps is less ‘eggcorn’ as typographical error, the omission of ‘a’ for one, as in the following:
While my’s correlation with might’s / mahy t / is definitely a case for a probable misinterpretation of the word used, I do believe that it’s valid to use may (and arguably better to do so in the examples) and these may seriously simply be cases of letter omission.
I don’t guess it’s a big deal, people very well may incorrectly use my instead of might, but it’s worth taking note of.
robf
Last edited by robeph (2008-03-31 01:25:44)
Offline
I’m pretty sure this one (or some variant thereof) has been discussed before, but I couldn’t find it using the search engine.
I think verbally people sort of drop the T sound and say “my’s well” instead of might as well, and perhaps that has been transferred to the way people spell it (ear spelling?). I doubt they consciously think “my” (as a possessive) has anything to do with the “as well” part. There doesn’t seem to be a new imagery that comes out of the phrase.
Feeling quite combobulated.
Offline
It’s actually in the Database, though I’m not sure it should be: http://eggcorns.lascribe.net/english/964/my/
Arnold Zwicky’s note there makes it clear that his is somewhat questionable as an eggcorn. He doesn’t consider robeph’s suggestion that letter-omission my be at work here—it’s a good point.
Offline
Pages: 1