Discussions about eggcorns and related topics
You are not logged in.
Registrations are currently closed because of a technical problem. Please send email to
The forum administrator reserves the right to request users to plausibly demonstrate that they are real people with an interest in the topic of eggcorns. Otherwise they may be removed with no further justification. Likewise, accounts that have not been used for posting may be removed.
Thanks for your understanding.
Chris -- 2018-04-11
Which would be correct?
Do we discuss the eggcornicity of a submission, or the eggcornocity?
Is there a linguistic rule governing these kinds of word constructions?
Offline
I have a vague – extremely vague – notion that -icity and -ocity are used with precise meanings in some technical field. Maybe physics?
But in everyday use the difference between -osity and -icity is a phonological, rather than a semantic¹ one. That is, for adjectives ending in -ic the derived noun ends in -icity; for adjectives ending in -ous, -ose or the like, the derived noun ends in -osity.
Since eggcorn is a new word, the question becomes, what is (or should be) the form of the derived adjective? I think that, subconsciously, I have been using eggcornicity in parallel with iconicity.
icon > iconic > iconicity
eggcorn > *eggcornic > eggcornicity
But I’ve never actually used the word “eggcornic” as far as I can remember.
Ah, but wait, Ken has:
klakritz, 2005-11-30, ‘do under others’ for ‘do unto others’
The Golden Rule is a prime target for eggcornic revision.
¹ I should, say, rather than a strictly semantic one, since there is some difference in nuance between -ic versus -ous etc. as suffixes for deriving adjectives.
Offline
I too prefer the iconicity of eggcornicity to the preposterosity of eggcornosity. Eggcornocity looks like a combination of the two, though maybe it is produced at a higher velocity.
Last edited by DavidTuggy (2008-08-21 15:39:12)
*If the human mind were simple enough for us to understand,
we would be too simple-minded to understand it* .
Offline
I’ve heard people say a word is “eggcornish” sometimes, I think. Perhaps that short i sound lends itself to “eggcornicity” more than to “ocity.”
Feeling quite combobulated.
Offline
If we’re going to use it as a song title, or in lyrics, I vote for “eggcornicity.”
Though, it won’t rhyme with “velocity.”
(my mother loves the moment in the song “The Last Saskatchewan Pirate” in which the writer finds a rhyme for “fertilizer”)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kHAl1tWvvPA
Offline
Hmmm. So it seems I jumped ahead a step, and it all comes down to whether words are eggcornic or eggcornous.
Offline
I vote for eggcornish and eggcornishness, but will continue to use eggcornosity or eggcornicness as my fancy moves me.
*If the human mind were simple enough for us to understand,
we would be too simple-minded to understand it* .
Offline