Discussions about eggcorns and related topics
You are not logged in.
Registrations are currently closed because of a technical problem. Please send email to
The forum administrator reserves the right to request users to plausibly demonstrate that they are real people with an interest in the topic of eggcorns. Otherwise they may be removed with no further justification. Likewise, accounts that have not been used for posting may be removed.
Thanks for your understanding.
Chris -- 2018-04-11
If ever there was a case demanding instant skepticism, this might be it. But look these over. The use of “clothes” for the eyes, for example, especially in the form of “eyes clothed” and “her eyes were clothes”, has an inescapable logic. OK, yes, WTF typos might explain some, but I think not all, of the instances that can be found out there.
People have a much harder time spelling “clothes” correctly than “close” so you would think the substitution would be uncommon. I wonder if an errant spellchecker had much to do with those reshapings. Anyway, it is fanciful to think that “clothes” might have been intended as part of an imagery shift. It has an almost romantic appeal to it.