Eggcorn Forum

Discussions about eggcorns and related topics

You are not logged in.

Announcement

Registrations are currently closed because of a technical problem. Please send email to if you wish to register.

The forum administrator reserves the right to request users to plausibly demonstrate that they are real people with an interest in the topic of eggcorns. Otherwise they may be removed with no further justification. Likewise, accounts that have not been used for posting may be removed.

Thanks for your understanding.

Chris -- 2018-04-11

#1 2010-08-27 02:43:21

JuanTwoThree
Eggcornista
From: Spain
Registered: 2009-08-15
Posts: 434

account vs a count

I can’t believe that there has been no mention of “take into a count”. So there probably has, even though I can’t find it.


On the plain in Spain where it mainly rains.

Offline

 

#2 2010-08-27 07:54:33

DavidTuggy
Eggcornista
From: Mexico
Registered: 2007-10-11
Posts: 2171
Website

Re: account vs a count

Works for me (as long as the count is of the numerical rather than the noble variety).


*If the human mind were simple enough for us to understand,
we would be too simple-minded to understand it* .

(Possible Corollary: it is, and we are .)

Offline

 

#3 2010-08-28 23:34:39

jorkel
Eggcornista
Registered: 2006-08-08
Posts: 1455

Re: account vs a count

At some point—long ago—there were a few eggcorns tossed around which had the “a-” to “a” reshaping, and it seemed pretty hard to offer up a comprehensive list. (This might’ve been around the same time that we were discussing how some reshapings are simply the selection of the wrong prefix … and so further searching seemed discouraged). Even so, we could certainly look at “account”/”a count” on it’s own merits since there is a significant drift of meaning involved.

Offline

 

Board footer

Powered by PunBB
PunBB is © 2002–2005 Rickard Andersson
Individual posters retain the copyright to their posts.

RSS feeds: active topicsall new posts