Eggcorn Forum

Discussions about eggcorns and related topics

You are not logged in.

Announcement

Registrations were closed for a long time because of forum spam, but I have re-opened them on a trial basis.

The forum administrator (chris dot waigl at gmail dot com) reserves the right to request users to plausibly demonstrate that they are real people with an interest in the topic of eggcorns. Otherwise they may be removed with no further justification. Likewise, accounts that have not been used for posting may be removed.

Thanks for your understanding.

Chris -- 2015-05-30

#1 2006-06-07 08:47:11

bradjensen68
Member
Registered: 2006-06-07
Posts: 1

"Illicit a response" instead of "elicit a response"

Names illicit racist response, says research

(title of an article in a Purdue University student publication) Maybe the names were illicit?

Offline

 

#2 2014-11-16 18:34:32

Dixon Wragg
Eggcornista
From: Cotati, California
Registered: 2008-07-04
Posts: 779

Re: "Illicit a response" instead of "elicit a response"

“Illicit” for “elicit” is quite a common substitution. Here’s the example I recently encountered in an online discussion:

Those three letters can illicit more emotion, disdain and intrigue than almost any others in Sebastopol’s history.

Occasionally you’ll also find this substitution in the opposite direction, as in:

Thursday night is elicit drug use.
English lesson

I reckon this is just a mildly amusing substitution with no eggcornish meaning-connection.

Offline

 

Board footer

Powered by PunBB
PunBB is © 2002–2005 Rickard Andersson
Individual posters retain the copyright to their posts.

RSS feeds: active topicsall new posts