Eggcorn Forum

Discussions about eggcorns and related topics

You are not logged in.

Announcement

The Eggcorn Forum and the Eggcorn Database are currently in the process of being converted into static sites.

Once the conversion is complete, all existing posts are expected to still be accessible at their original URLs. However, no new posts will be possible.

Feel free to comment on the relevant forum threads.

Chris -- 2025-05-10

#1 2006-06-07 07:47:11

bradjensen68
Member
Registered: 2006-06-07
Posts: 1

"Illicit a response" instead of "elicit a response"

Names illicit racist response, says research

(title of an article in a Purdue University student publication) Maybe the names were illicit?

Offline

 

#2 2014-11-16 17:34:32

Dixon Wragg
Eggcornista
From: Cotati, California
Registered: 2008-07-04
Posts: 1375

Re: "Illicit a response" instead of "elicit a response"

“Illicit” for “elicit” is quite a common substitution. Here’s the example I recently encountered in an online discussion:

Those three letters can illicit more emotion, disdain and intrigue than almost any others in Sebastopol’s history.

Occasionally you’ll also find this substitution in the opposite direction, as in:

Thursday night is elicit drug use.
English lesson

I reckon this is just a mildly amusing substitution with no eggcornish meaning-connection.

Offline

 

Board footer

Powered by PunBB
PunBB is © 2002–2005 Rickard Andersson
Individual posters retain the copyright to their posts.

RSS feeds: active topicsall new posts