Eggcorn Forum

Discussions about eggcorns and related topics

You are not logged in.


Registrations are currently closed because of a technical problem. Please send email to if you wish to register.

The forum administrator reserves the right to request users to plausibly demonstrate that they are real people with an interest in the topic of eggcorns. Otherwise they may be removed with no further justification. Likewise, accounts that have not been used for posting may be removed.

Thanks for your understanding.

Chris -- 2018-04-11

#1 2006-06-07 08:47:11

Registered: 2006-06-07
Posts: 1

"Illicit a response" instead of "elicit a response"

Names illicit racist response, says research

(title of an article in a Purdue University student publication) Maybe the names were illicit?



#2 2014-11-16 18:34:32

Dixon Wragg
From: Cotati, California
Registered: 2008-07-04
Posts: 1277

Re: "Illicit a response" instead of "elicit a response"

“Illicit” for “elicit” is quite a common substitution. Here’s the example I recently encountered in an online discussion:

Those three letters can illicit more emotion, disdain and intrigue than almost any others in Sebastopol’s history.

Occasionally you’ll also find this substitution in the opposite direction, as in:

Thursday night is elicit drug use.
English lesson

I reckon this is just a mildly amusing substitution with no eggcornish meaning-connection.



Board footer

Powered by PunBB
PunBB is © 2002–2005 Rickard Andersson
Individual posters retain the copyright to their posts.

RSS feeds: active topicsall new posts