Eggcorn Forum

Discussions about eggcorns and related topics

You are not logged in.

Announcement

Registrations are currently closed because of a technical problem. Please send email to if you wish to register.

The forum administrator reserves the right to request users to plausibly demonstrate that they are real people with an interest in the topic of eggcorns. Otherwise they may be removed with no further justification. Likewise, accounts that have not been used for posting may be removed.

Thanks for your understanding.

Chris -- 2018-04-11

#1 2006-06-25 23:11:19

Fishbait
Member
From: Brookline, MA
Registered: 2005-12-13
Posts: 38
Website

"Fully blown" for "full-blown"

119,000 hits on Google. Not quite an eggcorn, as this is a bit of morphological regularization rather than semantic reanalysis. But I’m sure the people who say “fully blown” don’t have in mind the sense of a flower in full bloom which is, I think the root of the idiom. Which brings me to the real point of this post:

Inside all of us hip descriptivists, isn’t there a cranky prescriptivist struggling to get out? The belief that all adverbs must end in “ly” drives me crazy. In fact, I think “fully blown” bothers me not because it violates any rule, but because I love English idioms—all the things we say just because we say them and always have. In this sense, I think a lot of bad writing is bad not because it violates the rules of English grammar and usage, but because it is not idiomatic—it turns its back on the pithiest, clearest, most traditional ways of expressing a thought, either because (a) the writer doesn’t know them; or (b) the writer finds them lacking in dignity—i.e., insufficiently pretentious. The second of these explains the “style” of the New York Times, I think. I’ve always supposed that the editors of NYT know what good writing is, and they hate it.

Comments, listers?

Offline

 

#2 2006-06-25 23:14:39

Fishbait
Member
From: Brookline, MA
Registered: 2005-12-13
Posts: 38
Website

Re: "Fully blown" for "full-blown"

Listers, please ignore the crossouts. How did these happen, anyway? They weren’t in the preview. . .

Fishbait

Offline

 

#3 2006-06-26 03:02:51

patschwieterman
Administrator
From: California
Registered: 2005-10-25
Posts: 1680

Re: "Fully blown" for "full-blown"

Chris uses the Textile text generator; it interprets dashes on both sides of a word or phrase as meaning that you want to show the passage as having been scored out. I think you can get rid of the scoring by putting spaces on either side of the dashes.

This site gives a brief rundown of Textile commands: http://textism.com/tools/textile/
They’re on the right-hand side of the screen; clicking on a particular command will bring up examples on the left.

I think pretentiousness is part of it, but there are other factors, too. I was always taught in school that you should say “speak quickly” rather than “speak fast.” Nothing wrong with “fast”—it’s a “flat” adverb without an -ly and has been around since the early 13th century at least. But if you get corrected often enough, you start internalizing the so-called rules.

I hope the NYT doesn’t use “fully blown.”

Offline

 

#4 2006-06-26 07:23:03

Chris Waigl
Eggcorn Faerie
From: London, UK
Registered: 2005-10-14
Posts: 115
Website

Re: "Fully blown" for "full-blown"

Thanks Pat. Your explanation is perfect.

I fixed the faulty formatting.

Offline

 

Board footer

Powered by PunBB
PunBB is © 2002–2005 Rickard Andersson
Individual posters retain the copyright to their posts.

RSS feeds: active topicsall new posts