Discussions about eggcorns and related topics
You are not logged in.
Registrations were closed for a long time because of forum spam, but I have re-opened them on a trial basis.
The forum administrator (chris dot waigl at gmail dot com) reserves the right to request users to plausibly demonstrate that they are real people with an interest in the topic of eggcorns. Otherwise they may be removed with no further justification. Likewise, accounts that have not been used for posting may be removed.
Thanks for your understanding.
Chris -- 2015-05-30
when you have a coffee in the mornings it gets you going same prince able as hair
if we can work together to create a profitable company and then another on the same prince-able
Jesus would have given them the same prince able that he gave John in Luke 9:49
840 ghits for this. Written as two words does rather suggest that perps think that it really is “prince able”. Why? Dunno.
On the plain in Spain where it mainly rains.
I see some semantic ties. “Principle” is an exalted word, redolent of high motives and superordination. The cognate “prince” has the same smell. The postfix “able” communicates power, capability, strength. Seems like an eggcorn match.
Hatching new language, one eggcorn at a time.
Quite a few people actually pronounce it “prince-able”, i.e. [‘pɹιnsəbl̩], rhyming with (not washable but) rinseable .
For them this might be a pronunciation spelling. But it is more probably eggcornish; i.e. if they spell it this way they probably have reanalyzed the word to incorporate the suffix – able . I’m with Juan, though, in thinking that the semantic fit of prince is much less clearly apropros.
*If the human mind were simple enough for us to understand,
we would be too simple-minded to understand it* .