Eggcorn Forum

Discussions about eggcorns and related topics

You are not logged in.

Announcement

Registrations are currently closed because of a technical problem. Please send email to if you wish to register.

The forum administrator reserves the right to request users to plausibly demonstrate that they are real people with an interest in the topic of eggcorns. Otherwise they may be removed with no further justification. Likewise, accounts that have not been used for posting may be removed.

Thanks for your understanding.

Chris -- 2018-04-11

#1 2020-08-18 10:18:31

kem
Eggcornista
From: Victoria, BC
Registered: 2007-08-28
Posts: 2853

day today << day to day

We’ve been scooped by the Merriam-Webster site. The M-W editors point out that “day today” for “day-to-day” may be an eggcorn.

It is quite a popular switch. Here are some examples. On an English web corpus, the substitution of “a day today basis” for “a day to day basis” happens in about 1 out of 300 instances.


Hatching new language, one eggcorn at a time.

Offline

 

#2 2020-08-18 16:53:15

DavidTuggy
Eggcornista
From: Mexico
Registered: 2007-10-11
Posts: 2714
Website

Re: day today << day to day

Explain for us how you see the semantics working? How does “day today” fit the contexts we use “day-to-day” in? (I feel like it does, but I’m not sure how to express it so I can say “I think it does”.)


*If the human mind were simple enough for us to understand,
we would be too simple-minded to understand it* .

(Possible Corollary: it is, and we are .)

Offline

 

#3 2020-08-20 11:56:05

kem
Eggcornista
From: Victoria, BC
Registered: 2007-08-28
Posts: 2853

Re: day today << day to day

Could be several different interpretations of the semantics. It partly depends on what the speaker thinks that “day-to-day” means.

The OED gives these meanings for the adjective:

A. Of or relating to each day in succession; happening regularly every day; daily. Also: concerned with each successive day without consideration for the future; that is focused on the short-term. B. Of an everyday character; ordinary; commonplace.

Probably best to take a specific example. Here’s one drawn from a summary of an article in the Women’s Studies International Forum.

Such narrow conceptions of the feminist collective identity stand in opposition to the ways feminism is practiced on a day-today basis, and contribute to a complex negotiation of the feminist identity.

In this case, it seems like the author is thinking of the meaning “of an everyday character.” If so, then the “day-today” substitution might mean something like “just like today, an ordinary day.” But the example may also be depending on the eggcorn to evoke something not contained in the normal understanding of “day-to-day”: a feeling of something being modern, up-to-date.


Hatching new language, one eggcorn at a time.

Offline

 

#4 2020-08-20 15:14:11

DavidTuggy
Eggcornista
From: Mexico
Registered: 2007-10-11
Posts: 2714
Website

Re: day today << day to day

So, A. daily could be sort of “each day when it is today”, with the added implication possible that you don’t focus on tomorrow. (As Emily Brewster suggested, “day today” would naturally bring to mind “day tomorrow” but contrasts with it.) Or, B. something that occurs each day while it is today could also be seen as quotidian, boring, ordinary, etc. The notion of being up-to-date fits with the notion of “each day while it is today” but is a further development, not so clearly part of the eggcorn.


*If the human mind were simple enough for us to understand,
we would be too simple-minded to understand it* .

(Possible Corollary: it is, and we are .)

Offline

 

#5 2020-09-04 11:27:46

DavidTuggy
Eggcornista
From: Mexico
Registered: 2007-10-11
Posts: 2714
Website

Re: day today << day to day

Maybe the meaning “up-to-date” comes from contrasting day today with day yesterday. I think I do use day-to-day in some contexts to mean something like up-to-the-minute, changed frequently enough that it cannot be out-of-date.


*If the human mind were simple enough for us to understand,
we would be too simple-minded to understand it* .

(Possible Corollary: it is, and we are .)

Offline

 

Board footer

Powered by PunBB
PunBB is © 2002–2005 Rickard Andersson
Individual posters retain the copyright to their posts.

RSS feeds: active topicsall new posts