Eggcorn Forum

Discussions about eggcorns and related topics

You are not logged in.

Announcement

Registrations are currently closed because of a technical problem. Please send email to if you wish to register.

The forum administrator reserves the right to request users to plausibly demonstrate that they are real people with an interest in the topic of eggcorns. Otherwise they may be removed with no further justification. Likewise, accounts that have not been used for posting may be removed.

Thanks for your understanding.

Chris -- 2018-04-11

#1 2024-06-18 07:00:47

DavidTuggy
Eggcornista
From: Mexico
Registered: 2007-10-11
Posts: 2752
Website

Ponderable imponderables

We have from time to time (I’m too busy—read, “too lazy”—to look them up just now) discussed apparent or overt opposites that get substituted for each other. I just ran across this jewel from a student back in ‘00:

I guess it’s just one of those ponderables.

My judgment at the time was that she had said this on purpose, but I did not write down any evidence that she had done so. If it was inadvertent, there are various explanations that could be advanced for it, like elision of the first syllable, which is often so unstressed as to be almost inaudible, or some sort of blending with another word beginning with “p” (“possibly unanswerable/inconclusive/etc.”, etc.), or who knows what. But if it were inadvertent, especially if it were to become established for the author and/or with her friends, it would be more eggcornish.
.
Because it really does make sense either way, and I almost like the un-negatived version a bit better. An “imponderable” is not something you can’t ponder, but something you can’t come to a conclusion about, ponder it as you will. A “ponderable” might well be (and probably was in the context), in addition, something well worth pondering even if you never do, or never even hope to, satisfactorily explain it.
.
If by using the phrase you can (as my student did) make people ponder your words and realize they were worth thinking about, you are embodying a deeper meaning by means of the surface meaning (much like a metaphor does.) The self-referential nature of the thing is beautiful to me.

Last edited by DavidTuggy (2024-06-20 10:43:53)


*If the human mind were simple enough for us to understand,
we would be too simple-minded to understand it* .

(Possible Corollary: it is, and we are .)

Offline

 

Board footer

Powered by PunBB
PunBB is © 2002–2005 Rickard Andersson
Individual posters retain the copyright to their posts.

RSS feeds: active topicsall new posts