bylaw » bi-law
The third citation was provided to me on 7 May 2005 by John McChesney-Young and caused me to search Google for other occurrences of “bi-law”. I’ve labeled it as “questionable” because I’m not clear about how people who use this spelling think twoness enters into the meaning of the expression. Maybe they think there’s a first, main, set of laws, and then there’s a second set, the bi-laws. Or maybe it’s just a misspelling.
Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.