Eggcorn Forum

Discussions about eggcorns and related topics

You are not logged in.

Announcement

Registrations are currently closed because of a technical problem. Please send email to if you wish to register.

The forum administrator reserves the right to request users to plausibly demonstrate that they are real people with an interest in the topic of eggcorns. Otherwise they may be removed with no further justification. Likewise, accounts that have not been used for posting may be removed.

Thanks for your understanding.

Chris -- 2018-04-11

#1 2023-12-08 15:17:31

Peter Forster
Eggcornista
From: UK
Registered: 2006-09-06
Posts: 1224

'mashing of teeth' for 'gnashing of teeth'

‘Gnash’ appears almost exclusively in a dental context, like gnaw, and possibly gnibble and gnag. And although m and n seem close companions, side by side on the keyboard for example and one trotting behind the other in the alphabet, their sounds don’t seem easily interchangeable. Nevertheless there is much mashing about.

“There is still a lot of crying and mashing of teeth,” said Dr. Hughes.

With much mashing of teeth and head scratching, I thought to check the rear lights, as I had added trailer lights awhile ago.

Seriously, so far she’s mashed her teeth, ground her teeth, pursed her teeth and so on in about every chapter of this book.

Manuel mashed his teeth together as rage filled him.

Offline

 

#2 2023-12-08 18:13:07

DavidTuggy
Eggcornista
From: Mexico
Registered: 2007-10-11
Posts: 2715
Website

Re: 'mashing of teeth' for 'gnashing of teeth'

Mashing food and such stuff with your teeth is marginally sayable, at least, for me. Mashing one tooth against another makes reasonable sense. That would be the eggcornish explanation. As you say, a fingerslip typo is another possibility.
.
You are certainly right that in English (and a number of other languages) the labial/oral distinction of m vs. n is salient, much more so than the oral front/back tongue-placement distinction of n vs. ng. Many languages (Spanish, for one) don’t contrast those two pronunciations at all systematically.


*If the human mind were simple enough for us to understand,
we would be too simple-minded to understand it* .

(Possible Corollary: it is, and we are .)

Offline

 

Board footer

Powered by PunBB
PunBB is © 2002–2005 Rickard Andersson
Individual posters retain the copyright to their posts.

RSS feeds: active topicsall new posts