Discussions about eggcorns and related topics
You are not logged in.
Registrations are currently closed because of a technical problem. Please send email to
The forum administrator reserves the right to request users to plausibly demonstrate that they are real people with an interest in the topic of eggcorns. Otherwise they may be removed with no further justification. Likewise, accounts that have not been used for posting may be removed.
Thanks for your understanding.
Chris -- 2018-04-11
Obviously neither, but does this qualify as an eggcorn?
“Harped on”, meaning to repeat; and “harked back to”, signifying to repeat, or go back to?
Today I caught myself dithering: did I mean “harped on” or “harked on”; or had I “harped back to” or “harked back to”?
The both share the same sense, and have a similar look/feel, but obviously one cannot hark on, nor can one harp back to, anything.
Is this then an example of an eggcorn?
Last edited by Azure-rumped Tanager (2010-01-21 08:49:13)
Offline
The hark back >> harp back switch got an analysis from linguist Mark Liberman at Language Log way back in the early days of eggcornology. It’s here: http://itre.cis.upenn.edu/~myl/language … 01117.html
Liberman feels it’s an eggcorn, though I personally worry the semantic link is a bit vague.
I’m not sure we (or they) have ever had a discussion about the other side of the coin (harp>>hark).
Last edited by patschwieterman (2010-01-21 22:42:38)
Offline
Wow, you guys do not muck around.
Thanks for the link, really informative and much appreciated.
Offline