Eggcorn Forum

Discussions about eggcorns and related topics

You are not logged in.

Announcement

Registrations are currently closed because of a technical problem. Please send email to if you wish to register.

The forum administrator reserves the right to request users to plausibly demonstrate that they are real people with an interest in the topic of eggcorns. Otherwise they may be removed with no further justification. Likewise, accounts that have not been used for posting may be removed.

Thanks for your understanding.

Chris -- 2018-04-11

#1 2010-05-09 14:44:23

kem
Eggcornista
From: Victoria, BC
Registered: 2007-08-28
Posts: 2851

delight, island

I just finished reading The Lexicographer’s Dilemma by Jack Lynch, a romp through the world of English and its etymologies by a serious scholar and superb writer (A description and some reviews are available in the Amazon listing for the book.). A major theme in Lynch’s book is the struggle between language descriptivists and language prescriptivists, a topic that has excited passions on this forum. He debunks several popular myths, among them the beliefs that Samuel Johnson wrote the first English dictionary (the first appeared more than a century and a half before Johnson’s) and that the dreaded deontologies of grammar derive from eighteenth century prescriptivists (many, perhaps most, of the no-nos appeared in the nineteenth century).

A bit of trivia from the book: The corpus of Shakespeare has only one split infinitive. It’s in sonnet 142. See if you can spot it: http://www.shakespeare-online.com/sonnets/142.html

Lynch has an interesting list of English spellings that were the result of Latin backcorrections. These include debt, doubt, subtle, receipt, salmon, and victual. Among the backcorrections are two hypercorrections that might be early eggcorns. He writes on p. 174:

“The spellings delit and delite [for delight ] were common in the thirteenth and fourteenth centuries…. [T]he word comes from French delitier or deliter. But some spelling reformers incorrectly thought it was related to English light and put the gh where it didn’t belong. The same thing happened to the word island, apparently through confusion with the word isle. That shorter form is a thirteenth-cnetury import from the French ile and can be traced back to the Latin insula, which is where the s comes from. But the longer word island doesn’t come from Latin at all; it’s a Germanic word, and the early forms are iland or yland. The s, in other words, can be defended in isle, but it doesn’t belong in island.

Last edited by kem (2010-05-09 15:23:03)


Hatching new language, one eggcorn at a time.

Offline

 

#2 2010-05-10 13:18:46

David Bird
Eggcornista
From: The Hammer, Ontario
Registered: 2009-07-28
Posts: 1690

Re: delight, island

Really interesting, Kem. Delight could well be an eggcorn, with the de- being that “wholly, completely” prefix. Otherwise it’s one of your “says one thing and means the opposite” pairs.

What led my interest to peaked be was that I recognized the word “délit”, but that word has nothing to do with delight. It refers to a crime, a mister meaner. Modern délit is related to delinquent, and is also there when you’re caught in flagrante delicto. French has lost the verb “déliter”, the root from which delight sprang and which also gave us delicious.

Offline

 

Board footer

Powered by PunBB
PunBB is © 2002–2005 Rickard Andersson
Individual posters retain the copyright to their posts.

RSS feeds: active topicsall new posts