Discussions about eggcorns and related topics
You are not logged in.
Registrations are currently closed because of a technical problem. Please send email to
The forum administrator reserves the right to request users to plausibly demonstrate that they are real people with an interest in the topic of eggcorns. Otherwise they may be removed with no further justification. Likewise, accounts that have not been used for posting may be removed.
Thanks for your understanding.
Chris -- 2018-04-11
In the NY Times Dec 3 in a comment to Paul Krugman’s column by Dan Green: “Corporations are not chalked full of social workers.” The last widely visible use of the correct or common version—“chock full” was in the name of a coffee that’s apparently less prominent than it once was.
Roony, your post got me wandering around in the Eggcorn catacombs. I leaned on a wall and it opened onto . In there he unearths multiple versions of chock-full: Chock, choke, chuck, check, chalk, jock, shock, and chog. The forum itself is chalked full: , , and then entered into the .
Let’s bring that list up to date a bit. I liked this version from chug-a-lug territory:
deliciously lush house track chug-full of repetitive keys and bass.
http://www.beatsandbeyond.com/archives/ … ol-15.html
Here’s another logical reimagination: jug full. The first two hits are the same perp, 3 years apart.
The creek was jug-full of salmon
http://books.google.ca/books?id=x4lnvOW … 22&f=false
The air was jug-full of confused ducks and geese
http://books.google.ca/books?id=pg2pDaF … 22&f=false
not too long ago this board was jug full of people making arses of themselves.
http://www.wmi.org/multi_boards/doc.asp … _texas.ini
Thanks, David—I see that I was a latecomer here on this. I haven’t looked up the actual derivation (if known) of chock-full; it seemed somehow obvious to me—but no doubt so did “jug full” down in Texas, and actually has a more transparent claim.