Eggcorn Forum

Discussions about eggcorns and related topics

You are not logged in.

Announcement

Registrations are currently closed because of a technical problem. Please send email to if you wish to register.

The forum administrator reserves the right to request users to plausibly demonstrate that they are real people with an interest in the topic of eggcorns. Otherwise they may be removed with no further justification. Likewise, accounts that have not been used for posting may be removed.

Thanks for your understanding.

Chris -- 2018-04-11

#1 2017-08-04 07:39:50

DavidTuggy
Eggcornista
From: Mexico
Registered: 2007-10-11
Posts: 2752
Website

c.f. < comes from

This came up, and may have been exemplified, in a post starting from December 2016 . ‘C.f.’ is of course a common mistake for ‘cf.’ (cf. Wiktionary. ad rem), but in most cases the usages suggest the perps are still thinking “compare” or something comparable.
.
I couldn’t get Google to find what I wanted. (It insists on showing results for “cf.” when I tell it to search for “c.f.”, for instance.) Can the rest of you find cases where it seems to mean “comes from”?
.
I rather like it that the subject of this email might be read as “comes from comes from comes from.”

Last edited by DavidTuggy (2017-08-04 07:51:04)


*If the human mind were simple enough for us to understand,
we would be too simple-minded to understand it* .

(Possible Corollary: it is, and we are .)

Offline

 

#2 2017-08-26 09:17:46

kem
Eggcornista
From: Victoria, BC
Registered: 2007-08-28
Posts: 2872

Re: c.f. < comes from

I can’t find any examples of this double mistake (thinking cf. is c. f. and thinking cf means “comes from” instead of “compare to”). But it seems a likely mistake.


Hatching new language, one eggcorn at a time.

Offline

 

#3 2017-08-26 10:08:12

DavidTuggy
Eggcornista
From: Mexico
Registered: 2007-10-11
Posts: 2752
Website

Re: c.f. < comes from

That December 2016 post on this forum seemed pretty clear to me.


*If the human mind were simple enough for us to understand,
we would be too simple-minded to understand it* .

(Possible Corollary: it is, and we are .)

Offline

 

Board footer

Powered by PunBB
PunBB is © 2002–2005 Rickard Andersson
Individual posters retain the copyright to their posts.

RSS feeds: active topicsall new posts