Eggcorn Forum

Discussions about eggcorns and related topics

You are not logged in.


Registrations are currently closed because of a technical problem. Please send email to if you wish to register.

The forum administrator reserves the right to request users to plausibly demonstrate that they are real people with an interest in the topic of eggcorns. Otherwise they may be removed with no further justification. Likewise, accounts that have not been used for posting may be removed.

Thanks for your understanding.

Chris -- 2018-04-11

#1 2016-12-04 03:37:03

Registered: 2016-10-23
Posts: 27

Origins of current slanguage

Without doing the research, I posited to a friend that three current Americanisms have fairly obvious roots:

1. “It is what it is” I would guess c.f. “That’s the way it is.” (with apologies to Eric Clapton for omitting “just”)

2. “one off” I would guess c.f. “One of a kind.” What’s was wrong the original term “unique?”

3. “bespoke” is a high-falutin’ way of ripping off the British word and using it as the American equivalent of “custom” or “custom made” or even “curated,” all the way back to “one off.”

Do any of you wish to proffer an opinion on or a factual reply to any of the above?



#2 2017-08-04 01:14:18

Registered: 2017-08-04
Posts: 1

Re: Origins of current slanguage

General American is sometimes broadly characterized as “speaking with a midwestern accent,”American’ accent or notions like ‘network English’ there is in fact no single norm of pronunciation



#3 2017-08-04 08:07:42

From: Mexico
Registered: 2007-10-11
Posts: 2198

Re: Origins of current slanguage

Does “c.f.” mean “comes from” ? That’s a new usage, to me, if so. Eggcornish, in fact: a few know cf. c.f. Latin confer “compare”, but for most of us it’s pretty much just an arbitrary written but not spoken word. So if people are thinking of it as an abbreviation of “comes from”, and thinking that is the standard usage, it meets my criteria.

Last edited by DavidTuggy (2017-08-04 08:15:36)

*If the human mind were simple enough for us to understand,
we would be too simple-minded to understand it* .

(Possible Corollary: it is, and we are .)



#4 2017-08-08 09:12:33

From: Ohio
Registered: 2007-06-07
Posts: 184

Re: Origins of current slanguage

Yes, David, c.f. for “comes from” is new to me, too. I agree with you about its eggcornishness, joining the ranks of “et all”, “at hominem/ad homonym”, et al

“I always wanted to be somebody. I should have been more specific.” – Lily Tomlin



Board footer

Powered by PunBB
PunBB is © 2002–2005 Rickard Andersson
Individual posters retain the copyright to their posts.

RSS feeds: active topicsall new posts