Eggcorn Forum

Discussions about eggcorns and related topics

You are not logged in.

Announcement

The Eggcorn Forum and the Eggcorn Database are currently in the process of being converted into static sites.

Once the conversion is complete, all existing posts are expected to still be accessible at their original URLs. However, no new posts will be possible.

Feel free to comment on the relevant forum threads.

Chris -- 2025-05-10

#1 2010-09-19 01:23:23

sharonf
Member
Registered: 2010-09-19
Posts: 2

"would of" for "would have"

Probably old news to you all, but I couldn’t really get a good search on such common words. Does this qualify as an eggcorn?

Offline

 

#2 2010-09-19 05:57:37

DavidTuggy
Eggcornista
From: Mexico
Registered: 2007-10-11
Posts: 2768
Website

Re: "would of" for "would have"

If it would of made any sense it might of. I of never been able to get a clear image/meaning shift between have and ̥_of_ here (note e.g. that both can be used of possession in a very wide sense of that term), and tend to think of this as more phonologically driven (i.e. the spelling of represents the sloppy-speech pronunciation that has become perfectly standard, but is more standardly spelled “’ve”.).


*If the human mind were simple enough for us to understand,
we would be too simple-minded to understand it* .

(Possible Corollary: it is, and we are .)

Offline

 

Board footer

Powered by PunBB
PunBB is © 2002–2005 Rickard Andersson
Individual posters retain the copyright to their posts.

RSS feeds: active topicsall new posts