Discussions about eggcorns and related topics
You are not logged in.
The Eggcorn Forum and the Eggcorn Database are currently in the process of being converted into static sites.
Once the conversion is complete, all existing posts are expected to still be accessible at their original URLs. However, no new posts will be possible.
Feel free to comment on the relevant forum threads.
Chris -- 2025-05-10
Feels greasy on the skin? Would that be a flaw?
This stuff drives me crazy. I do love the inadvertent poetry, but I feel that we are losing odd old forms and having them replaced by commonplace words. “Honing in on” really raises my shackles. Er, hackles.
Offline
“Flaw in the ointment” is in the Database: http://eggcorns.lascribe.net/english/133/flaw/
I know what you mean about losing odd old words. I’ve had many posts on the forum in which I’ve railed against people railing against linguistic change, but I too have a sentimental attachment to a lot of quirky old words endangered by their eggcornish progeny.
But in this regard, “hone in on” is something of a fence-sitter for me. “Home in on” is a rank newcomer, a phrase that hasn’t been around a whole lot longer than “hone in on”; it’s been competing with the eggcorn for most of its short life. And “hone” as a verb isn’t all that old, but it’s not a verb you meet everyday, and it certainly carries more than a whiff of its ancient, Anglo-Norse roots. The substituted word in most eggcornish phrases is a really common word; “hone in on” by contrast is a bit of an oddball in featuring a quirky word like “hone.” As a result, I like it—it keeps “hone” in front of people, and reminds them of a useful alternative to more common words like “sharpen,” “refine,” “practice,” etc.
Offline