Eggcorn Forum

Discussions about eggcorns and related topics

You are not logged in.

Announcement

The Eggcorn Forum and the Eggcorn Database are currently in the process of being converted into static sites.

Once the conversion is complete, all existing posts are expected to still be accessible at their original URLs. However, no new posts will be possible.

Feel free to comment on the relevant forum threads.

Chris -- 2025-05-10

#1 2010-12-20 10:08:23

Peter Forster
Eggcornista
From: UK
Registered: 2006-09-06
Posts: 1275

'embarko' for 'embargo'

Embarko could be read as a veto on disembarkation, which seems roughly embargoish from where I’m sitting:

Is there an embarko on weight as I believe my quoted amount is more than Quoted?

an embarko on arms sales to. Pakistan and to provide her !with bombers, jet’.fighters, and armored personnel carriers.

Technically I think they can look but there maybe an embarko on them ie a WWE Policy preventing them from posting.

Offline

 

#2 2010-12-20 12:04:36

DavidTuggy
Eggcornista
From: Mexico
Registered: 2007-10-11
Posts: 2768
Website

Re: 'embarko' for 'embargo'

Anywhere else that -o has a negative-looking usage (that could be parlayed into a negative meaning)? (Your example of veto counts as a possible/probable for me—are there others? No itself?)

Last edited by DavidTuggy (2010-12-20 12:50:49)


*If the human mind were simple enough for us to understand,
we would be too simple-minded to understand it* .

(Possible Corollary: it is, and we are .)

Offline

 

Board footer

Powered by PunBB
PunBB is © 2002–2005 Rickard Andersson
Individual posters retain the copyright to their posts.

RSS feeds: active topicsall new posts