Eggcorn Forum

Discussions about eggcorns and related topics

You are not logged in.

Announcement

Registrations are currently closed because of a technical problem. Please send email to if you wish to register.

The forum administrator reserves the right to request users to plausibly demonstrate that they are real people with an interest in the topic of eggcorns. Otherwise they may be removed with no further justification. Likewise, accounts that have not been used for posting may be removed.

Thanks for your understanding.

Chris -- 2018-04-11

#1 2010-12-20 10:08:23

Peter Forster
Eggcornista
From: UK
Registered: 2006-09-06
Posts: 1258

'embarko' for 'embargo'

Embarko could be read as a veto on disembarkation, which seems roughly embargoish from where I’m sitting:

Is there an embarko on weight as I believe my quoted amount is more than Quoted?

an embarko on arms sales to. Pakistan and to provide her !with bombers, jet’.fighters, and armored personnel carriers.

Technically I think they can look but there maybe an embarko on them ie a WWE Policy preventing them from posting.

Offline

 

#2 2010-12-20 12:04:36

DavidTuggy
Eggcornista
From: Mexico
Registered: 2007-10-11
Posts: 2752
Website

Re: 'embarko' for 'embargo'

Anywhere else that -o has a negative-looking usage (that could be parlayed into a negative meaning)? (Your example of veto counts as a possible/probable for me—are there others? No itself?)

Last edited by DavidTuggy (2010-12-20 12:50:49)


*If the human mind were simple enough for us to understand,
we would be too simple-minded to understand it* .

(Possible Corollary: it is, and we are .)

Offline

 

Board footer

Powered by PunBB
PunBB is © 2002–2005 Rickard Andersson
Individual posters retain the copyright to their posts.

RSS feeds: active topicsall new posts