Discussions about eggcorns and related topics
You are not logged in.
Registrations were closed for a long time because of forum spam, but I have re-opened them on a trial basis.
The forum administrator (chris dot waigl at gmail dot com) reserves the right to request users to plausibly demonstrate that they are real people with an interest in the topic of eggcorns. Otherwise they may be removed with no further justification. Likewise, accounts that have not been used for posting may be removed.
Thanks for your understanding.
Chris -- 2015-05-30
David Bird and others have mentioned “in” << >> “and” confusion, including “case and point” for “case in point”. Here’s the example I stumbled upon recently:
Case and point, when Mr. Weill left Citigroup in 2006, the price per share was $55.
It seems to me that an eggcornish meaning confusion could be based upon this phrase’s similarity to phrases like “point and match” and “check and mate”. The implication of making a point in an argument (in both senses of the term) could, I think, give rise to “case and point” as a true eggcorn.
That makes a lot of sense to me, Dixon. (It’s one of the so numberous cases where I see blending along with the eggcornicality.)
Point, match and set figures in with the others, for me, and strike three and you’re out and doubtless others.
Last edited by DavidTuggy (2013-11-23 18:28:05)
*If the human mind were simple enough for us to understand,
we would be too simple-minded to understand it* .