Eggcorn Forum

Discussions about eggcorns and related topics

You are not logged in.

Announcement

The Eggcorn Forum and the Eggcorn Database are currently in the process of being converted into static sites.

Once the conversion is complete, all existing posts are expected to still be accessible at their original URLs. However, no new posts will be possible.

Feel free to comment on the relevant forum threads.

Chris -- 2025-05-10

#1 2015-10-03 11:07:44

lt12e
Member
Registered: 2015-10-03
Posts: 1

'Literally' instead of 'Little' ?

I am not sure if this qualifies as an eggcorn, but today I saw this: “Literally did they know that they actually did you a favor Jeff!”. It was here: https://www.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid … 4055620558

Offline

 

#2 2015-10-03 15:01:54

DavidTuggy
Eggcornista
From: Mexico
Registered: 2007-10-11
Posts: 2768
Website

Re: 'Literally' instead of 'Little' ?

Give us a plausible semantic path the perp(s) may be following here? How can they mean “literally” and yet make the whole phrase “literally did they know” work out at all reasonably to mean “they did not know” ?
.
(And, welcome to the forum!)

Last edited by DavidTuggy (2015-10-03 15:04:13)


*If the human mind were simple enough for us to understand,
we would be too simple-minded to understand it* .

(Possible Corollary: it is, and we are .)

Offline

 

#3 2015-10-07 08:20:54

DavidTuggy
Eggcornista
From: Mexico
Registered: 2007-10-11
Posts: 2768
Website

Re: 'Literally' instead of 'Little' ?

Mulling: could the literally mean something like “really”, and the interrogative-related ordering did they know (rather than they knew/did know ) mean “it is doubtful whether they knew” ? This might yield something like “It is really doubtful whether they knew”, or perhaps “Probably/pretty clearly they really didn’t know”; or “Really, could they possibly have known?”. Those readings would be in the ballpark.

But I can’t convince myself, little alone anybody else.


*If the human mind were simple enough for us to understand,
we would be too simple-minded to understand it* .

(Possible Corollary: it is, and we are .)

Offline

 

Board footer

Powered by PunBB
PunBB is © 2002–2005 Rickard Andersson
Individual posters retain the copyright to their posts.

RSS feeds: active topicsall new posts