Eggcorn Forum

Discussions about eggcorns and related topics

You are not logged in.

Announcement

Registrations are temporarily closed as we're receiving a steady stream of registration spam.

Anyone who wishes to register, please email me at chris dot waigl at gmail dot com with the desired username and a valid email address, and I will register you manually.

Thanks for your understanding.

Chris -- 2011-03-08

#1 2005-11-14 19:28:13

demongirl
Member
Registered: 2005-11-14
Posts: 1

"loathe" vs "loath"

The misuse of “loath” (being unwilling) and “loathe” (to detest) is a constant irritation to me. I googled “loathe to” and got more than 700,000 hits.

Examples: While I’m sure that states detest losing their ability to regulate insurance plans, as was described in this article on Stateline.org’s web site, http://www.stateline.org/live/ViewPage. … tId=15775, I think it’s fair to say that they were more unwilling to do so.

(I hope I’m doing this right, I’m a newbie here)

Offline

 

#2 2005-11-14 19:51:51

Chris Waigl
Eggcorn Faerie
From: London, UK
Registered: 2005-10-14
Posts: 115
Website

Re: "loathe" vs "loath"

Well, many of us have substitutions or misspelling we find annoying, in particular those who are in the business of teaching generation upon generation of incoming youngsters.

But I’m afraid, this doesn’t make it an eggcorn. See for example Arnold Zwicky’s comment on the entry lose»loose, which is also not an eggcorn: There is no indication of a reinterpretation of one in terms of the sense of the other here. This is just a misspelling by people who don’t know which is which.

Offline

 

#3 2005-11-27 07:45:06

SimonW11
Member
Registered: 2005-11-27
Posts: 8

Re: "loathe" vs "loath"

Chris Waigl wrote:

But I’m afraid, this doesn’t make it an eggcorn.

Which is I presume why she posted it in the section which is after all for
“discussions about things that aren’t (necessarily) eggcorns”.

Simon

Offline

 

#4 2011-10-07 13:17:45

JuanTwoThree
Eggcornista
Registered: 2009-08-15
Posts: 336

Re: "loathe" vs "loath"

I’m waking this one up to mention

“I’m loathed to say/admit/etc”

“I’m loathed to” gets 143,000 hits and could mean “People hate me for __ing” which gets closer to eggcorniness.

Offline

 

#5 2011-10-14 18:57:05

Dixon Wragg
Eggcornista
From: Santa Rosa, California
Registered: 2008-07-04
Posts: 650

Re: "loathe" vs "loath"

About 25 years ago when I was working on my MA in Counseling, in a paper I wrote about a client I had in a counseling internship, I mentioned being “loathe to” do something. My teacher (who was a real jerk), took my innocent misspelling as a Freudian slip revealing that I supposedly loathed the client.

Offline

 

#6 2012-01-28 05:12:38

kem
Eggcornista
From: Victoria, BC
Registered: 2007-08-28
Posts: 2152

Re: "loathe" vs "loath"

Another variation (not too common, though) is “low to admit” for “loath to admit.” Perhaps the substituter is thinking about feeling low, or perhaps about the despicability of the action.

Bio on classic film site: “Although I am low to admit it, there are many times I would rather live in another place and time. ”

Forum post: “I hate my boss. I am low to admit this, but I am to the point where I now think I may hate her.”

Tattooing ad site: “the folks answering the phone sometimes aren’t very helpful and I am *low to admit*… not always so nice…”

Offline

 

#7 2012-01-28 11:30:23

Peter Forster
Eggcornista
From: UK
Registered: 2006-09-06
Posts: 827

Re: "loathe" vs "loath"

For those who simply can’t be bothered to confess their culpability (and rhyme sloth with both rather than moth) the insertion of a stray sibilant provides yet another variant:

I am sloth to admit it, but I am just slower than I used to be.

They were sloth to admit that they’d done something wrong.

Offline

 

Board footer

Powered by PunBB
PunBB is © 2002–2005 Rickard Andersson
Individual posters retain the copyright to their posts.

RSS feeds: active topicsall new posts