Eggcorn Forum

Discussions about eggcorns and related topics

You are not logged in.

Announcement

Registrations are currently closed because of a technical problem. Please send email to if you wish to register.

The forum administrator reserves the right to request users to plausibly demonstrate that they are real people with an interest in the topic of eggcorns. Otherwise they may be removed with no further justification. Likewise, accounts that have not been used for posting may be removed.

Thanks for your understanding.

Chris -- 2018-04-11

#1 2020-08-23 12:49:21

kem
Eggcornista
From: Victoria, BC
Registered: 2007-08-28
Posts: 2872

quince

On this forum, we’ve had occasion to mention the backformations “pea” and “cherry,” both of which started out as singular words with a terminal “s” sound that was interpreted as a plural.

Yesterday I was walking through the orchard of Victoria’s Government House and came across a quince. Hadn’t seen one these for many a year-quinces are a sort of legacy fruit in modern gardens and orchards. In the course of looking up information on the tree, I noticed that the word “quince” may also be a backformation. But backformed in the opposite direction. The name of the fruit started out in English as “coyn.” The OED speculates that its use as a collective singular (“the coyn aren’t ripe yet”) led to a postfix “s” that was eventually interpreted as a singular.


Hatching new language, one eggcorn at a time.

Offline

 

#2 2020-08-26 10:50:32

DavidTuggy
Eggcornista
From: Mexico
Registered: 2007-10-11
Posts: 2752
Website

Re: quince

Would have expected quinze or quinse , with the voiced z sound like pease has, if it began as a plural. (We don’t say bince as the plural of bin , and though bins is written with an s we pronounce that orthographic s as if it were z .) Any hint of a final nt ? ( Quints is practically if not absolutely identical in pronunciation to quince .)

Last edited by DavidTuggy (2020-08-26 11:03:30)


*If the human mind were simple enough for us to understand,
we would be too simple-minded to understand it* .

(Possible Corollary: it is, and we are .)

Offline

 

#3 2020-08-27 10:23:36

kem
Eggcornista
From: Victoria, BC
Registered: 2007-08-28
Posts: 2872

Re: quince

I looked for the “nts” ending (i.e, “quints” in place of “quince”), but I couldn’t find many examples that were convincing slips. And the few I found were not likely to be eggcorns.


Hatching new language, one eggcorn at a time.

Offline

 

#4 2020-08-27 11:49:47

DavidTuggy
Eggcornista
From: Mexico
Registered: 2007-10-11
Posts: 2752
Website

Re: quince

Right. I was meaning, is there evidence that coyn might ever have been pronounced coynt , as that would make the voicelessness of the -ce ending perfectly normal for a plural.

Last edited by DavidTuggy (2020-08-29 19:15:00)


*If the human mind were simple enough for us to understand,
we would be too simple-minded to understand it* .

(Possible Corollary: it is, and we are .)

Offline

 

#5 2020-09-07 12:38:28

kem
Eggcornista
From: Victoria, BC
Registered: 2007-08-28
Posts: 2872

Re: quince

No evidence. Here are the OED spelling records:

ME quence, ME queynce, ME qvynce, ME qwyns, ME (16 Scottish) quense, ME–15 quynce, ME–15 quyns, ME–15 quynse, ME–15 qwince, ME– quince, 15 qwynce, 15–16 quinse.


Hatching new language, one eggcorn at a time.

Offline

 

Board footer

Powered by PunBB
PunBB is © 2002–2005 Rickard Andersson
Individual posters retain the copyright to their posts.

RSS feeds: active topicsall new posts