Eggcorn Forum

Discussions about eggcorns and related topics

You are not logged in.

Announcement

The Eggcorn Forum and the Eggcorn Database are currently in the process of being converted into static sites.

Once the conversion is complete, all existing posts are expected to still be accessible at their original URLs. However, no new posts will be possible.

Feel free to comment on the relevant forum threads.

Chris -- 2025-05-10

#1 2022-03-24 22:29:03

kem
Eggcornista
From: Victoria, BC
Registered: 2007-08-28
Posts: 2887

denigrade << denigrate

I’ve been reading Jennifer Raff’s new book on ancient human DNA, Origins. Last night I came across the line in it “These claims were denigraded by….” Odd, I thought, to see such a bald-faced misspelling in a book from a good publisher. It should have been “denigrated.”

The confusion about the spelling of “denigrate” seems to be a common error. You can see hundreds of examples of this misspelling here. According to Google Ngram, the error happens about 1/10 of one percent of the time (there is an odd peak for this error about 1980, for which I have no explanation).

The more I pondered this, the more I thought this must be an eggcorn, or at least a blidiom. People seem to be blending “degrade” with “denigrate.”


Hatching new language, one eggcorn at a time.

Offline

 

#2 2022-03-25 02:17:37

DavidTuggy
Eggcornista
From: Mexico
Registered: 2007-10-11
Posts: 2767
Website

Re: denigrade << denigrate

Downgrade too?


*If the human mind were simple enough for us to understand,
we would be too simple-minded to understand it* .

(Possible Corollary: it is, and we are .)

Offline

 

#3 2022-06-01 19:34:38

DavidTuggy
Eggcornista
From: Mexico
Registered: 2007-10-11
Posts: 2767
Website

Re: denigrade << denigrate

fwiw

Prior to its buyout, Beatrice faced sagging profits, downigraded debt, anid rumors of possible takeover.

Still, a loan can be downigraded-say, by one notch-to account for the impairment of related loans.


*If the human mind were simple enough for us to understand,
we would be too simple-minded to understand it* .

(Possible Corollary: it is, and we are .)

Offline

 

Board footer

Powered by PunBB
PunBB is © 2002–2005 Rickard Andersson
Individual posters retain the copyright to their posts.

RSS feeds: active topicsall new posts