Eggcorn Forum

Discussions about eggcorns and related topics

You are not logged in.

Announcement

Registrations are currently closed because of a technical problem. Please send email to if you wish to register.

The forum administrator reserves the right to request users to plausibly demonstrate that they are real people with an interest in the topic of eggcorns. Otherwise they may be removed with no further justification. Likewise, accounts that have not been used for posting may be removed.

Thanks for your understanding.

Chris -- 2018-04-11

#1 2005-12-05 23:06:57

Chris Russell
Member
Registered: 2005-12-05
Posts: 2

"Could of" for "could have"

Also “should of”, “must of” and all the other perfect modals.

I’m astounded by how many people I’ve mentioned this to make this mistake. Obviously due to the pronunciation of the contracted form, ‘ve

Offline

 

#2 2005-12-06 22:21:20

annburlingham
Member
Registered: 2005-12-05
Posts: 4

Re: "Could of" for "could have"

Yes, but… is it an eggcorn?

Offline

 

#3 2005-12-12 10:52:36

naki
Member
Registered: 2005-12-12
Posts: 1

Re: "Could of" for "could have"

Most definitely.

Offline

 

#4 2005-12-13 22:42:42

Fishbait
Member
From: Brookline, MA
Registered: 2005-12-13
Posts: 38
Website

Re: "Could of" for "could have"

Very common, but not an eggcorn—just a phonetic misspelling. There’s no etymological misconstruction.

Offline

 

Board footer

Powered by PunBB
PunBB is © 2002–2005 Rickard Andersson
Individual posters retain the copyright to their posts.

RSS feeds: active topicsall new posts