Eggcorn Forum

Discussions about eggcorns and related topics

You are not logged in.

Announcement

Registrations are currently closed because of a technical problem. Please send email to if you wish to register.

The forum administrator reserves the right to request users to plausibly demonstrate that they are real people with an interest in the topic of eggcorns. Otherwise they may be removed with no further justification. Likewise, accounts that have not been used for posting may be removed.

Thanks for your understanding.

Chris -- 2018-04-11

#1 2007-08-29 13:45:57

Jim Dixon
Member
From: St. Paul, Minnesota, USA
Registered: 2006-08-11
Posts: 44

Outcast vs. outcaste

I don’t know the history of these words, so I can’t decide which is an eggcorn, but I suspect one of them is. Maybe someone with access to the OED can enlighten me.

The Merriam-Webster site (www.webster.com/dictionary) says:

Outcast:
1 : one that is cast out or refused acceptance (as by society) : PARIAH

Outcaste:
1 : one who has been ejected from a Hindu caste for violation of its customs or rules
2 : one who has no caste

…which isn’t very helpful. The meanings are so similar that it doesn’t seem practical to try to keep them separate. However, they do suggest different imagery.

Some people do seem to use them interchangeably, or get them confused.

I encountered this problem when I was researching a song written by Tom Russell. According to www.allmusic.com, the song title is spelled THE OUTCAST on Russell’s album “The Man from God Knows Where,” released in 1999, but the same song is called THE OUTCASTE on another Russell album, “The Wounded Heart of America,” 2007.

Of course, music publishers are notorious for spelling errors, so I can’t be sure the change was deliberate.

You can see lyrics of the song at http://www.mudcat.org/thread.cfm?threadid=90375#1712282

Offline

 

#2 2007-08-29 15:12:12

jorkel
Eggcornista
Registered: 2006-08-08
Posts: 1456

Re: Outcast vs. outcaste

Very curious situation. Is it possible that these two words might have originated independently of one another—and still have very close meaning?

Offline

 

#3 2007-08-30 02:50:47

patschwieterman
Administrator
From: California
Registered: 2005-10-25
Posts: 1680

Re: Outcast vs. outcaste

It does look like these two arose independently. “Outcast” first appears in the late 14th century acc. to the OED. “Outcaste” appears in the 1830s, and the earliest uses do seem to apply to situations where a formal “caste” was involved. The OED’s later citations show the term’s meaning becoming more general and merging a bit with “outcast.”

All of that doesn’t prove, however, that “outcast” didn’t influence the original form of “out-caste.” The OED just doesn’t give enough info to say anything more certain.

Offline

 

Board footer

Powered by PunBB
PunBB is © 2002–2005 Rickard Andersson
Individual posters retain the copyright to their posts.

RSS feeds: active topicsall new posts