Eggcorn Forum

Discussions about eggcorns and related topics

You are not logged in.

Announcement

Registrations are currently closed because of a technical problem. Please send email to if you wish to register.

The forum administrator reserves the right to request users to plausibly demonstrate that they are real people with an interest in the topic of eggcorns. Otherwise they may be removed with no further justification. Likewise, accounts that have not been used for posting may be removed.

Thanks for your understanding.

Chris -- 2018-04-11

#1 2007-10-05 17:39:26

Tod_Kearns
Member
Registered: 2007-10-05
Posts: 1

"A whole nother subject"...said often, but never written.

I recently heard someone say this during a conversation about another subject being not just another subject but “a whole nother subject”. I asked him “How would you spell what you just said?”. He replied “I never really thought about how it would be spelled”.

I just thought it was interesting because I have been hearing it more frequently lately and wonder when people will actually begin to write such a phrase.

Offline

 

#2 2007-10-07 15:06:23

Fishbait2
Eggcornista
From: Brookline, MA
Registered: 2006-10-08
Posts: 80
Website

Re: "A whole nother subject"...said often, but never written.

Well, they’ve written it about 1,780,000 times on the Internet, according to Google. I think it’s an interesting example of “infixation,” meaning that the word “another” is split and another word inserted. This is common enough, although the inserted word usually starts with an “f,” as in “absofuckin’lutely.” In other words, I think the phrase “a whole ‘nother. . . ” is deliberate and jocular in its origins, not an accidental redivision of the sort that generated “an apron” from “a napron.” By now though it’s just a colloquialism.

Offline

 

#3 2007-10-07 15:24:11

Fishbait2
Eggcornista
From: Brookline, MA
Registered: 2006-10-08
Posts: 80
Website

Re: "A whole nother subject"...said often, but never written.

Aha! Here’s a very nice discussion, including the apparently well-known phenomenon of fuckin’-infixation (the British use “bloody”) . . .

http://linguistlist.org/issues/14/14-2909.html

Offline

 

Board footer

Powered by PunBB
PunBB is © 2002–2005 Rickard Andersson
Individual posters retain the copyright to their posts.

RSS feeds: active topicsall new posts