Eggcorn Forum

Discussions about eggcorns and related topics

You are not logged in.

Announcement

Registrations are currently closed because of a technical problem. Please send email to if you wish to register.

The forum administrator reserves the right to request users to plausibly demonstrate that they are real people with an interest in the topic of eggcorns. Otherwise they may be removed with no further justification. Likewise, accounts that have not been used for posting may be removed.

Thanks for your understanding.

Chris -- 2018-04-11

#1 2007-11-03 12:52:28

Gillieson
Member
Registered: 2007-11-03
Posts: 2

'In the sticks' for beyond the Styx

It seems to me that ‘in the sticks’ is frequently heard in the news and the expression is really ‘beyond the Styx’. If you Google “in the sticks” it brings up 450,000 hits!

This must be an eggcorn. Any thoughts?

Offline

 

#2 2007-11-03 14:39:40

jorkel
Eggcornista
Registered: 2006-08-08
Posts: 1456

Re: 'In the sticks' for beyond the Styx

Welcome to the Eggcorn Website, Gillieson,
I had a little discussion on sticks and Styx here:

Out in the STYX (sticks) by jorkel Contribute! 0 2007-06-09 13:16:29 by jorkel

Last edited by jorkel (2007-11-04 06:19:05)

Offline

 

#3 2007-11-04 00:41:33

patschwieterman
Administrator
From: California
Registered: 2005-10-25
Posts: 1680

Re: 'In the sticks' for beyond the Styx

As Jorkel pointed out in his post, “the sticks” refers to wooded areas out in the country. I’ve always assumed that the phrase was supposed to have a dismissive, urban-hipster air to it—as if the city-slicker who’s speaking considers living trees and dead wood to be more or less equivalent.

I’ve never heard “beyond the Styx” used to refer to the boondocks. Does anyone use it that way? It’d make a certain degree of sense: for the true downtown scenester, the countryside might really seem like the realm of shades.

As far as I know, however, the two phrases are independent of each other. I doubt one arose as an eggcorn of the other, but I find Jorkel’s finds entertaining.

For anyone wanting a shortcut to Jorkel’s interesting post, it’s here: http://eggcorns.lascribe.net/forum/view … hp?id=1804

Offline

 

#4 2007-11-05 14:26:32

Gillieson
Member
Registered: 2007-11-03
Posts: 2

Re: 'In the sticks' for beyond the Styx

In reply to patschwieterman, I admit that as a relatively elderly graduate of one of those posh British private schools, I often heard the phrase “beyond the Styx” used in exactly the way thay “in the sticks” is nowadays commonplace. In my youth (1950s) the two phrases were not just independent, the second did not exist! I repeat my assertion that this is a true eggcorn. I rest my case.

Offline

 

#5 2007-11-05 16:06:01

patschwieterman
Administrator
From: California
Registered: 2005-10-25
Posts: 1680

Re: 'In the sticks' for beyond the Styx

This may be a case of an American/British split. I used books.google.com to search for examples of “out in the sticks” published before 1950, and I got many hundreds of hits. (Though admittedly only the citations of books—not journals/magazines—are relatively trustworthy.) In fact, the first page of hits had a citation from a book published in 1917, and there are lots of hits from the 1920s and 1930s. I only had time to look at a few, but the earlier citations all looked to be American.

It’d be interesting to pursue this one further in datable newspaper archives—the situation is clearly more complex than either Gillieson or I thought.

Offline

 

#6 2013-12-31 16:06:30

burred
Eggcornista
From: Montreal
Registered: 2008-03-17
Posts: 1112

Re: 'In the sticks' for beyond the Styx

Ngrams seem to indicate another fraternal twin birth. Gillieson has a point, though I doubt he is quite that elderly.

Offline

 

Board footer

Powered by PunBB
PunBB is © 2002–2005 Rickard Andersson
Individual posters retain the copyright to their posts.

RSS feeds: active topicsall new posts