Eggcorn Forum

Discussions about eggcorns and related topics

You are not logged in.

Announcement

The Eggcorn Forum and the Eggcorn Database are currently in the process of being converted into static sites.

Once the conversion is complete, all existing posts are expected to still be accessible at their original URLs. However, no new posts will be possible.

Feel free to comment on the relevant forum threads.

Chris -- 2025-05-10

#1 2008-08-06 02:10:29

Dixon Wragg
Eggcornista
From: Cotati, California
Registered: 2008-07-04
Posts: 1375

"laxadaisical" for "lackadaisical"

I’ve heard this one a number of times. It’s obviously a cross between “lax” and “lackadaisical”. Is that what some of you refer to as a “blend”, or is that something else?

Dixon

Offline

 

#2 2008-08-06 07:23:32

DavidTuggy
Eggcornista
From: Mexico
Registered: 2007-10-11
Posts: 2768
Website

Re: "laxadaisical" for "lackadaisical"

Yes, a good blend. Eggcornlike in that it changes imagery and is certainly standard for a lot of people. I don’t mind calling it an eggcorn.

A “cross between” is a perfectly good name, but a “blend” is probably more standard, and ties it to similar kinds of phenomena at other levels (phrasal blends, syntactic blends, etc. Semantic blending is ubiquitous: in my view it’s the very mechanism by which we connect concepts when we think.)

btw and fwiw, it’s been discussed several times on the site. Go to the Eggcorn Database page and use the google search on “laxadaisical”.

Last edited by DavidTuggy (2008-08-06 07:25:35)


*If the human mind were simple enough for us to understand,
we would be too simple-minded to understand it* .

(Possible Corollary: it is, and we are .)

Offline

 

#3 2008-08-07 02:30:14

Dixon Wragg
Eggcornista
From: Cotati, California
Registered: 2008-07-04
Posts: 1375

Re: "laxadaisical" for "lackadaisical"

DavidTuggy wrote:

”...it’s been discussed several times on the site. Go to the Eggcorn Database page and use the google search on ‘laxadaisical’.”

Ohhhhh, I didn’t realize that the Google search function on this site could be used to search only the site itself, so I hadn’t tried it before. I’d only looked at the “Browse Eggcorns” list to see if the word had already been listed, but that list is clearly woefully incomplete.

Dixon

Offline

 

#4 2008-08-07 08:16:42

DavidTuggy
Eggcornista
From: Mexico
Registered: 2007-10-11
Posts: 2768
Website

Re: "laxadaisical" for "lackadaisical"

No biggie. I’ve reported already-reported stuff myself more than once, so that was the voice of experience.


*If the human mind were simple enough for us to understand,
we would be too simple-minded to understand it* .

(Possible Corollary: it is, and we are .)

Offline

 

#5 2008-08-07 13:22:02

TootsNYC
Eggcornista
Registered: 2007-06-19
Posts: 263

Re: "laxadaisical" for "lackadaisical"

I like this one. I’m tempted to just start using it. If I didn’t have kids (who will learn these idiots-er, idioms-only by hearing them), I would.

I mean, who says “lack a day!” anymore?

Offline

 

#6 2008-08-30 01:06:02

Dixon Wragg
Eggcornista
From: Cotati, California
Registered: 2008-07-04
Posts: 1375

Re: "laxadaisical" for "lackadaisical"

TootsNYC wrote:

I mean, who says “lack a day” anymore?

Did anyone ever say “lack a day”?

Dixon

Offline

 

#7 2008-08-30 08:30:39

DavidTuggy
Eggcornista
From: Mexico
Registered: 2007-10-11
Posts: 2768
Website

Re: "laxadaisical" for "lackadaisical"

Dixon Wragg wrote:

Did anyone ever say “lack a day”?

Well, I have on occasion said “Alack-a-day”. But I tend to repeat odd things I’ve heard or read, for fun.


*If the human mind were simple enough for us to understand,
we would be too simple-minded to understand it* .

(Possible Corollary: it is, and we are .)

Offline

 

Board footer

Powered by PunBB
PunBB is © 2002–2005 Rickard Andersson
Individual posters retain the copyright to their posts.

RSS feeds: active topicsall new posts