Eggcorn Forum

Discussions about eggcorns and related topics

You are not logged in.

Announcement

Registrations are currently closed because of a technical problem. Please send email to if you wish to register.

The forum administrator reserves the right to request users to plausibly demonstrate that they are real people with an interest in the topic of eggcorns. Otherwise they may be removed with no further justification. Likewise, accounts that have not been used for posting may be removed.

Thanks for your understanding.

Chris -- 2018-04-11

#1 2010-12-24 08:37:32

jsomers
Member
Registered: 2010-12-24
Posts: 5

"part-took" for "partook"

Found in a comment by iwwr on a Hacker News post (http://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=2036925):

> Regarding the American Revolution, it is interesting to note that tax rates immediately after were higher than during British rule. Even George Washington part-took in the centralization of the American state afterwards [. . .].

Partook is the past participle for “partake,” of which one definition is “to join in (an activity).” Another gloss for that would be “to take part in (an activity),” which is what iwwr seems to be going for.

Last edited by jsomers (2010-12-24 08:38:25)

Offline

 

#2 2010-12-24 09:26:05

kem
Eggcornista
From: Victoria, BC
Registered: 2007-08-28
Posts: 2872

Re: "part-took" for "partook"

Welcome to the forum, jsomers.

“Part take” for “partake” is probably a restoration of a component (“part”) that may, for some speakers, have been lost in the spelling/sound changes during the word’s evolution. Somewhat like “contraband/contra-ban” that we looked at earlier this year. These restorations can be eggcorns if the restored components have picked up new associations and meanings that they can bring back to the show. In the case of “partake,” I don’t feel that much is added by the restoration.

Last edited by kem (2010-12-24 09:31:12)


Hatching new language, one eggcorn at a time.

Offline

 

#3 2010-12-24 14:27:05

jsomers
Member
Registered: 2010-12-24
Posts: 5

Re: "part-took" for "partook"

That sounds about right to me, kem. Thanks for the warm welcome.

Offline

 

Board footer

Powered by PunBB
PunBB is © 2002–2005 Rickard Andersson
Individual posters retain the copyright to their posts.

RSS feeds: active topicsall new posts