Eggcorn Forum

Discussions about eggcorns and related topics

You are not logged in.


Registrations are temporarily closed as we're receiving a steady stream of registration spam.

Anyone who wishes to register, please email me at chris dot waigl at gmail dot com with the desired username and a valid email address, and I will register you manually.

Thanks for your understanding.

Chris -- 2011-03-08

#1 2011-06-29 03:17:33

Dixon Wragg
From: Santa Rosa, California
Registered: 2008-07-04
Posts: 715

"instance" for "incident"

This confusion was mentioned in passing by DavidTuggy on a thread about co-instance/coincidence. You can see it here: … hp?id=3505

Here’s the instance I encountered: “I never really thought about this instance until much later…” (from Beefheart: Through the Eyes of Magic by John “Drumbo” French) It seemed pretty clear from the context that “incident” was what was really meant.

If it’s an eggcorn, I’m afraid it’s not a very exciting one, due to the abstractness of both words’ meanings not creating any interesting images or jokes, and to the very similar definitions of the two words. But I thought I’d share it just for the record, so to speak.



#2 2011-06-29 10:31:06

From: Montreal
Registered: 2008-03-17
Posts: 971

Re: "instance" for "incident"

It strikes me as a potential blend with elements of ‘instant’ and ‘incident’ and ‘incidence’.



#3 2011-07-07 22:37:02

Registered: 2007-06-08
Posts: 71

Re: "instance" for "incident"

I see it as just a mistake. Over the past 5 to 10 years, I have often heard “instance”, “incidents” and “incedence” used interchangeably. Becuase of this common confusion, I have heard “incidences” for “incidents” a number of times. The meanings of “instance” and “incident” can be pretty close, so it’s not surprising that people get them confused.


Last edited by yanogator (2011-07-07 22:38:17)



Board footer

Powered by PunBB
PunBB is © 2002–2005 Rickard Andersson
Individual posters retain the copyright to their posts.

RSS feeds: active topicsall new posts