Eggcorn Forum

Discussions about eggcorns and related topics

You are not logged in.

Announcement

Registrations were closed for a long time because of forum spam, but I have re-opened them on a trial basis.

The forum administrator (chris dot waigl at gmail dot com) reserves the right to request users to plausibly demonstrate that they are real people with an interest in the topic of eggcorns. Otherwise they may be removed with no further justification. Likewise, accounts that have not been used for posting may be removed.

Thanks for your understanding.

Chris -- 2015-05-30

#1 2012-06-24 13:53:40

kem
Eggcornista
From: Victoria, BC
Registered: 2007-08-28
Posts: 2229

fourk << fork

The word “fork” looks like it might be good Anglo-Saxon, on the analogy of “work.” The assumption is wrong, however. “Fork” comes to us, as does the rhyming “pork,” from Latin sources. “Fork” is based on furca, the word Romans used for a pitchfork.

The pointy bits on a fork are tines, a word that is solid AS. Over the centuries the number of tines on a standard fork has varied. Fork-using cultures settled on a four-tine implement as the public standard in the early 19th century.

The adoption of the four-tine standard set the stage for a hidden eggcorn. Some folks, it seems, started to hear “four” in “fork.” It comes out of hiding in the (not uncommon) spelling “fourk.”

A book I’m reading now mentions the well-known (not to me) story of a toddler who, when presented with a three-tine dessert fork, pronounced it a “threek.”

Offline

 

#2 2012-06-24 16:47:21

David Bird
Eggcornista
From: Montréal, QC
Registered: 2009-07-28
Posts: 1267

Re: fourk << fork

Aha, so that’s why American Gothic is so disturbing. Even his shirt (or is that overalls under there) is threeky.

Offline

 

Board footer

Powered by PunBB
PunBB is © 2002–2005 Rickard Andersson
Individual posters retain the copyright to their posts.

RSS feeds: active topicsall new posts