Eggcorn Forum

Discussions about eggcorns and related topics

You are not logged in.


Registrations are temporarily closed as we're receiving a steady stream of registration spam.

Anyone who wishes to register, please email me at chris dot waigl at gmail dot com with the desired username and a valid email address, and I will register you manually.

Thanks for your understanding.

Chris -- 2011-03-08

#1 2012-06-24 17:53:40

From: Victoria, BC
Registered: 2007-08-28
Posts: 2211

fourk << fork

The word “fork” looks like it might be good Anglo-Saxon, on the analogy of “work.” The assumption is wrong, however. “Fork” comes to us, as does the rhyming “pork,” from Latin sources. “Fork” is based on furca, the word Romans used for a pitchfork.

The pointy bits on a fork are tines, a word that is solid AS. Over the centuries the number of tines on a standard fork has varied. Fork-using cultures settled on a four-tine implement as the public standard in the early 19th century.

The adoption of the four-tine standard set the stage for a hidden eggcorn. Some folks, it seems, started to hear “four” in “fork.” It comes out of hiding in the (not uncommon) spelling “fourk.”

A book I’m reading now mentions the well-known (not to me) story of a toddler who, when presented with a three-tine dessert fork, pronounced it a “threek.”



#2 2012-06-24 20:47:21

David Bird
From: Montréal, QC
Registered: 2009-07-28
Posts: 1251

Re: fourk << fork

Aha, so that’s why American Gothic is so disturbing. Even his shirt (or is that overalls under there) is threeky.



Board footer

Powered by PunBB
PunBB is © 2002–2005 Rickard Andersson
Individual posters retain the copyright to their posts.

RSS feeds: active topicsall new posts