Discussions about eggcorns and related topics
You are not logged in.
Registrations are temporarily closed as we're receiving a steady stream of registration spam.
Anyone who wishes to register, please email me at chris dot waigl at gmail dot com with the desired username and a valid email address, and I will register you manually.
Thanks for your understanding.
Chris -- 2011-03-08
A buff is an obsessively knowledgeable enthusiast. And when someone is spouting obscure information, it can be hard to tell if they’re bluffing. Examples:
Not a movie bluff at all, I just want to know if Kajol is actually playing a blind girls role.
I am also a movie bluff (but not of Hollywood style) and do some jogging.
For a movie bluff, being part of the creation is a reward.
As a cinema bluff, I am well acquainted with the various acting methods, such as,Theatre and well, Method.
OWN YOUR OWN “INTERNATIONAL TIME MACHINE”? PLANE CLOCK. Perfect gift for the aviation bluff.
Ghost Cadet This book is great for a civil war bluff…
www.zooscape.com/cgi-bin/maitred/WhiteP … 0833587749
...information on many preservation, restoration, and documentation efforts, as well as a detailed calendar of events essential to a lighthouse bluff.
Good one! Maybe they think people who spout such information are trying to credit themselves with an expert status they don’t deserve, like Cliff Clavin (“it’s a little known fact”) of Cheers fame. It’s funny to think there are people so skeptically predisposed against all buffs.
“I know somebody [is] going to rebluff my statements about rebar but this is what I do for a living everyday,”
“Still pressing for acceptance of his work by the United States Government, he was rebluffed once more in 1856…,”
it seems almost certain that “rebluff” is being employed in a context that requires “rebuff.” Since the “buff” radical did migrate into English with the expanded “rebuff,” it is a lost radical (actually, a never-had radical). Lost radicals are almost always temptations for serial replacers. To bluff, in the sense of warding off by an exaggerated show of force, shares some semantic space with “rebuff.” The “buff” part of “rebuff” originally meant “to puff.”
I think the first example the idiomatic word should be rebut. See elsewhere on the forum ‘rebuffal’ for ‘rebuttal’
There are lots of examples of people using rebuff instead of rebut (or rebluff.)
Disclaimer: “If you represent Sabena, you are welcome to rebuff my statements.”
Gynomastia forum: “If any legitimate answers to the points I raised existed, moobius would have used them to rebuff my position and secure that of his own- he couldn’t do that.”
I think the first example the idiomatic word should be rebut.
“Rebut” or “rebuff” as the acorn for “rebluff.” It’s a tough call, isn’t it? Many contexts fit with both interpretations.
Most of the OED citations of “rebuff,” I note, employ the past participle of the word (“rebuffed”). “Rebluffed” may be more likely to be a permutation of “rebuffed” and “rebluff” a more likely switch for “rebut.”
Examples with “rebluffed:”
: “Now do I go up to New Ager’s and others and call them Satanists? no. That would be untactful and considered unfriendly, and I would be rebluffed. ”
: “Each time I have asked to help you move back in you have rebluffed me and come up with excuses.”
:—- “akhbazian forces were rebluffed three times before the georgians were pushed into the gorge by russian forces”
Here’s another reshaping – perhaps the thinking is that the rebuttal is like a sacrifice bunt in the argument. The word “refute” also works in the idiom but isn’t as close as “rebut.”
Youtube comment: “So you can’t rebunt my point agaisn’t your made up arguments so instead brought up and hide behind other incident that its not exactly the same as Libya.”
Discussion forum: “I didn’t realize you had rebunted any of my claims.”
Discussion forum: “Or would you choose to defend him again with your rebuntal.”
Last edited by larrybob (2012-10-04 19:09:52)