Discussions about eggcorns and related topics
You are not logged in.
The Eggcorn Forum and the Eggcorn Database are currently in the process of being converted into static sites.
Once the conversion is complete, all existing posts are expected to still be accessible at their original URLs. However, no new posts will be possible.
Feel free to comment on the relevant forum threads.
Chris -- 2025-05-10
Bi-lingual English / French amateur etymologist and all-round pedant
Offline
In my time in corporations, I’ve always heard “core competencies” (1.9 million Google hits)—never “competences” (322,000 hits)
“competency” is the noun I’m familiar with; it’s actually older than “competence” (1596 tvs 1632), though the newer “competence” is the preferred in Merriam-Webster’s College (tenth). (indicated by the fact that the only definition given for “competency” is the cross-reference to “competence”).
I was familiar w/ “competency”—He’s got some competency in math, but struggles a lot with science.
I think this is just an example of two alternate forms of the same essential noun.
This reminds me of the computer-industry phrase I hated when I worked at InformationWeek: “compute intensive.”
“Compute” is a verb—grammatically, it should be “computation intensive” bcs you do lots of computations.
But the term is established—if you tried to change it, nobody would know what you mean.
Offline
Better late than never ! OK, I’m learning …
Since we’re on pet hates, when I worked in industry my personal bête noire was when our HR Director referred to ‘renumeration’ packages – meaning of course ‘remuneration’. But actually, since he spent most of his time firing large numbers of people perhaps the term wasn’t so wide of the mark.
Bi-lingual English / French amateur etymologist and all-round pedant
Offline
Yes, renumeration for remuneration has been mentioned a couple of times in the Forum. I’m sure I’ve heard it in the wild, too. It’s a dandy!
Offline