Eggcorn Forum

Discussions about eggcorns and related topics

You are not logged in.


Registrations are temporarily closed as we're receiving a steady stream of registration spam.

Anyone who wishes to register, please email me at chris dot waigl at gmail dot com with the desired username and a valid email address, and I will register you manually.

Thanks for your understanding.

Chris -- 2011-03-08

#1 2005-12-07 17:09:58

Registered: 2005-12-05
Posts: 4

Shakespierre for Shakespeare

I’m trying to track down a book I have seen, fake French by one “Guillaume Shakespierre,” as I recall (when read alound, the French words resolve themselves into English sounds), only to find that “Shakespierre” is a fairly common misspelling. I just find it funny.



#2 2005-12-07 20:02:55

From: Winchester Massachusetts
Registered: 2005-10-25
Posts: 674

Re: Shakespierre for Shakespeare

This is a great misspelling, and there’s a nice converse out there; ‘Robespeare’ for ‘Robespierre.,’ e.g.

From them, sprung Robespeare—Danton & Murat [Jean Paul Marat?], who deluged it
in blood.



#3 2005-12-07 22:32:56

From: California
Registered: 2005-10-25
Posts: 1665

Re: Shakespierre for Shakespeare

I don’t know the Shakespierre book, but the concept sounds a lot like the one underpinning the book “Mots d’Heures: Gousses, Rames” by Louis d’Antin Van Rooten. The title, if read with with more or less French pronunciation, turns out to refer to familiar nursery rhymes, all of which are delivered in English that’s disguised as nonsensical French.



Board footer

Powered by PunBB
PunBB is © 2002–2005 Rickard Andersson
Individual posters retain the copyright to their posts.

RSS feeds: active topicsall new posts